Saturday, June 25, 2005

This Message Brought to You by Monarch

Although I enjoyed the commercial for Monarch, (also known as Technology, the Internet and Progressive Politics) it brought up a question for me: What type of arrangement with Monarch does this man have that he feels the need to mention their software by name 12 times in the article?

I thought this deserved a bit of investigation, so I searched for Monarch on Google and the first link I found was through - no kidding - an endorsement by Rep. Jesse Jackson. I looked around a little more and found a very prominent link to Monarch on his website.

Nobody loves their software that much - clearly someone was getting paid.

The article was a great case study on early targeting strategies. Even though targeting has progressed light years since the mid-nineties through predictive models, it is still good to be reminded of the basic strategy involved. I'm sure the author truly wanted to show progressive organizations how they could benefit from this technology.

I'm just saying...someone was getting paid.

Friday, June 24, 2005

The Good - The Bad - The Baskerville

Viola Baskerville was recently a candidate for the Democratic nomination for lieutenant Governor of Virginia. Although she lost her primary bid, her website is certainly worth discussing. Her small budget campaign made some both good and bad decisions regarding her Internet campaign.

One particularly innovative feature on Baskerville's website was the Invite Viola to Your Event option. By clicking a link on the home page, users are taken to an online form through which they can request Baskerville's attendance at their function. As a candidate with little name recognition and few resources, this feature encouraged community members to feature the candidate at their events by making it an easy and accessible process. This allowed Baskerville important voter contact and a way to earn media coverage. It also made the scheduling process simpler for the campaign and easier to manage.

The Invite Viola form collects essential information in an efficient manner. It asks typical contact information, such as name, organization, e-mail, phone and address. It also requires event information such as date, time, number of expected attendees and a description. Finally, the form categorizes Baskerville's attendance as "attend and be recognized," "deliver keynote," "deliver brief remarks." The information collected allowed the Baskerville team to make strategic decisions about event attendance without time wasted on follow up phone calls or emails.

Unfortunately, Baskerville's Volunteer for Viola feature failed to perform in an effective or strategic manner. After signing up to volunteer and receive the newsletter on June 1st, I received not one piece of communication from the campaign. Baskerville did not even send out an email reminding supporters to vote in the sleepy and easily overlooked primary.

The perceived snub by the of campaign of those who wished to volunteer served to alienate Baskerville's most important supporters. By not contacting them and inviting them to become a part of the campaign, Baskerville missed an important opportunity. Utilizing viral marketing techniques, the campaign could easily and cheaply empowered their supporters to recruit others to the campaign.

This constitutes a serious strategic error since the extremely low voter turnout in this election meant that mobilizing just a few voters could have made the difference. With no candidates utilizing paid media in the primary, an aggressive Internet communication plan would have been the most efficient way to spread her message.

In addition to the lack of follow up, the volunteer form had serious usability issues. For example, while it clearly states "* indicates a required field", there were no asterisks on the form so users were left to guess. Also, there is a link to the privacy policy at the bottom of the page, but it is in extremely small print and brings a "page not found" error when clicked.

Although Baskerville did attempt to utilize the Internet to assist her campaign efforts, her failure to follow up with supporters and potential volunteers ultimately hindered her efforts. Baskerville could have easily and cheaply mobilized supporters by using the Internet resources she already had, which could have made the difference in the primary contest.

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Google Maps - Surprisingly Insightful

Like an oracle of truth, Google Maps seems to know all. It is so insightful it is becoming almost scary. Let me prove my point:

Go to Google Maps.
Search for "village idiot Washington DC." What comes up? The White House
Search for "miserable failure Washington DC." What comes up? The White House
Search for "crooked politician Washington DC." White House again!

Amazing, Isn't it?

Before you become too excited about this new discovery, I searched for "media whore Washington DC" and there's not one pointer to the Capitol! A serious lapse in judgment...

Monday, June 20, 2005

People Really Are As Dumb As I Think

In our classes so far, Emi has talked about different ways that her clients have misused their websites. One example was the campaign that didn't want their phone number on the website. She has also discussed how campaigns are reticent to integrate their websites with their other communication strategies.

I have to admit that I believed this kind of talk was pretty "last year." Surely, in 2005, no one would make these mistakes.

Never underestimate the stupidity or short-sightedness of others.

Today, I was on the website for Deer Park Water, trying to find the customer service phone number and it's not on there - ANYWHERE. And it is a a Nestle company! Maybe their web designer was having a stroke - who knows - but there is no way to contact Deer Park unless you call your co-worker and make them dig through their invoices to find it.

And then there is this quote from an article I read yesterday:
The Democrats have pursued a more scattershot course designed to promote individual advantage for former staffers and candidates, rather than to build for the party as a whole. Even when Kerry's Internet team offered to write a "best practices and lessons learned" report about the campaign, Kerry campaign higher-ups failed to requisition it.

Wow! They didn't even see enough value in their Internet campaign - a campaign that raised a lot of money - to capture their lessons learned.

It is strange that the Internet as a medium can be so over and under-valued all at the same time.

Sunday, June 19, 2005

A Day Off?

As I write this it is Sunday morning. While kicking back with Russert and my cornflakes, I noticed that Emi's blog, Press Control Shift, hasn't been updated since Friday. According to her post on May 25th, this should mean that we all get a day off, right? To refresh your memory:
How about this: I will hold myself to the same standard. I will have a blog, too, and post to it every day. If I miss one or two days, I will allow students to miss the same number of days with no penalty.
I'm already dreaming about what I will do on my day off - the day I break the chains of this blog and run free.

The Privacy Policy That Ate The Democrats

I read an incredibly interesting article today about what happens to e-mail lists after the balloons drop and the campaign is over. Specifically, it is about how the Kerry campaign, once again, screwed us.

Apparently, while the Bush campaign has transferred their email list of 1.4 million names to the Republican National Committee, Kerry's list of 2.75 million loyal Democrats remains Kerry's property. Why would Kerry not transfer this list to the DNC and help build his Party?
But thanks to the wording of Kerry's online privacy policy during the primary, which promised to bar the forwarding of supporters' e-mail addresses to anyone outside the campaign, this list is now the proprietary possession of the junior Massachusetts senator.
This has serious repercussions for the Democrats. Whether by accident or by design, the most valuable email list ever compiled by Democrats is now being controlled by one solitary Senator with his eye on '08 (In your dreams, John!). As the Internet becomes a more and more powerful campaign tool, this type of short-sighted leadership will keep us in the minority.